#Precedents #Clarence #Thomas #Overturn
Sign up to obtain our weekly e-newsletter of the very best New Yorker podcasts.
Justice Clarence Thomas voted within the majority in final month’s abortion decision, however he issued a separate, concurring opinion articulating an excessive view that different rights derived from privateness—akin to contraception and same-sex intimacy—aren’t constitutional rights in any respect. The constitutional-law professor and New Yorker contributor Jeannie Suk Gersen talks with David Remnick about Thomas’s concurrence and the way the Justice’s as soon as fringe views at the moment are on the heart of the Court docket’s authorized philosophy. Plus, Emily Nussbaum talks with the comic Hannah Gadsby, and Patricia Marx tries out flotation remedy—previously referred to as a sensory-deprivation tank. Her microphone was the one factor that discovered peace.
What Precedents Would Clarence Thomas Overturn Subsequent?
The Justice was as soon as an outlier for his “outre” authorized views. Now, Jeannie Suk Gersen says, he’s the center of a conservative bloc that’s solely getting began.
The Comic Hannah Gadsby on “Nanette”
The New Yorker’s Emily Nussbaum talked with the comic about her breakout second, a critique of standup within the type of a standup present referred to as “Nanette.”
Enjoyable Is Aggravating
“Flotation remedy”—also called sensory deprivation—is a classy technique to disconnect. However Patricia Marx discovered that enjoyable is simply too demanding.
The New Yorker Radio Hour is a co-production of WNYC Studios and The New Yorker.